Only problem with taking the adventurous route with Battlefield is that the game could potentially dip into risky territory. Conflicts that simply are lesser known, not as long-lasting, or even uninteresting from a gameplay perspective could make developing these games that much less feasible. It's very unlikely Battlefield 6 would select anything that's pre-20th century that isn't WW2 or the Vietnam War, but there is the tiniest chance that a spin-off title or mainline entry could explore a conflict not often seen in ga

Of course, this brings into question what time period Battlefield 6 could take place in. It's very possible the series could return to contemporary warfare, similar to many entries before. Or the franchise could pull another Battlefield 1 and pick a time of war that games have rarely portrayed. There's a few options for Battlefield 6 in terms of a time period or setting, ranging from the most likely to most improba

Of course, the Battlefield franchise could surprise fans with something completely new for the series. Perhaps not as outlandish Battlefield Hardline , but something like a completely new time period or setting. There's still a variety of conflicts throughout world history that many games, not just Battlefield , still haven't tackled in a video game. Conflicts like the American Civil War, the Korean War, and the modern 20th century Middle Eastern conflicts come to mind. Any one of those wars would be a wild departure for the series thus far, but would be incredibly unique. It would give a chance for players to get to know some of the lesser conflicts in world history that are worth know

Rival franchise Call of Duty also did something similar, and has seen phenomenal success with its Modern Warfare reboot. It's not a one-to-one comparison by any means, but it should at least be encouraging for the Battlefield series. The Call of Duty series also put out a WWII shooter in 2017 that, while not exactly as unpopular as Battlefield 5 has become for fans, also had a particularly middling release even for a Call of Duty title. There were a few problems with microtransactions (a prevalent issue back in 2017 for several games) , the weapon and perk variety in multiplayer, and story gripes as well. Then Call of Duty went back to basics with Modern Warfare , and so far has seen great success, not even counting Warzo

Perhaps the worst thing now is Battlefield is dealing with an identity crisis. Being the gritty simulatory modern combat experience Battlefield is known for just isn't enough. Call of Duty: Modern Warfare does that, but also backs that with the characters like Captain Price who make the experience more memorable. Not only that, but Modern Warfare 's version of Ground War essentially became a version of Conquest from Battlefield , minus the destruction. A lot of what made Battlefield special, Call of Duty is now doing even bett

Thanks to the success of games like Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order , EA is clearly feeling ambitious about its future plans. Fans of its many properties will just have to wait and see how the company delivers on these ambitions once the PS5 and Xbox Series X hit shel

Battlefield 5 , the most recent release in the Battlefield franchise, is ending support this June, with Battlefield 6 confirmed to be on the way. Both Call of Duty and Battlefield have recently revisited World War 2 as a return to each franchise's roots. Now it seems Call of Duty 's annual releases are shifting back to modern and futuristic battlefields. Either EA's first-person shooter will follow suit, or the franchise could once again carve its own p

Simply put, previous Battlefield games have seen success in a modern setting before so it makes sense to return there. Some of the most popular games in the franchise like Bad Company 1/2 and Battlefield 3/4 each saw great commercial and critical success depicting modern warfare. Battlefield is in a peculiar position it's honestly never really been in before, where the series got its start simulating battles of WWII but has now seen one of its worst-performing games based in WWII . Jumping back to a modern time period, as ironic as it may be, could be exactly what the franchise needs for a comeb

There are some key aspects throughout Battlefield 's history that have contributed to the franchise becoming a bit mediocre. Defining features like destruction are no longer emphasized in a functional manner, while single-player is consistently forced into the experience, despite often being an afterthought for players who love Battlefield 's signature multiplayer. Battlefield is having an identity crisis, one that's not easily solved. Battlefield needs to hone in on what made the series so special in the first place and emphasize t

Modern Warfare and Warzone will certainly still be alive and kicking by the time that Battlefield 6 comes out. The developer has stated its commitment to keeping the current reboot around as click the following post primary multiplayer Call of Duty experience for a long time yet, and the dev has made good on that commitment so far by continuing to release new content at a pace that even other triple-A developers struggle to keep up w